I mean having a list of allowed clients.

As I said in my post, WhatsApp already enforce forbidding third party client and it seems to work well.

I don't see why wouldn't Signal improve the security of their users by implementing this, while upsetting the very few users who use third party clients.

There are already 2 third party forks I know of, Molly and Signal-JW.

They both use and access the main production Signal servers.

As I said, a compromise here would be to have a client security certification program, where no other clients outside it would be able to use Signal.

While I rather use more secure apps for following public channels, sadly they don't exist on other platforms.

Because I want to view and share only content that respect my freedom of use.

Because the article is licensed under free license (Creative Commons).

As long as the source prove to have enough credibility, I would always link to the freely licensed version over less freely licensed sources.

• Directory.

• UK Goverment.

• Pluralistic.

• decoded blog.

• Seirdy.

• XKCD.

• Authorama.

• The Center for the Book in the Library of Congress.

• blocSonic.

• Arcade Rage.

• comiCSS.

• WikiBooks.

• SoylentNews.

But that means that no one can post any new news websites, even if they are very credible.

This open the door for judging the unreviewed sources based on nothing.

I literally posted a article from UK government website today and I was surprised that it's not rated according to the media bias fact checker bot.

The irony of your comment.

"I don't like your comment so maybe you should not comment again you fascist"

If I ever produce a creative work I will release it into public domain.

A lot of authors and artists choose to release their work to the public domain voluntarily.

What is your logic here?

All of this would take maximum less than a week to be reversed and paid by residents taxes.

And this is assuming they done it on thousands of cars, which I believe is not really something that happen in real life.

I just want to say:

Fuck Copyright

Unpopular opinion, but doing that means only that taxes that is paid by residents of the city is going to cover paying for that instead of paying for any thing more useful.

You can't call for anarchy while living in a regulated system.

lol.

I am confused, that is exactly what the title is saying, right?

Edit: I believe that is 1.4M pills containing 153 Kgs of fentanyl.

I guess you are a troll, I already explained to you why they mention his nationality and that the number of pills is high in general, if you consider it insignificant, then that is only your opinion here.

The end of the fiscal year 2024 is 30/Sep and the start was in 1/Oct 2023 .

Here is a article explaining it: Why the beginning of fiscal year 2024 is in October, not January.

Sigh, good job spitting links instead of facts.

I don't get what you are trying to communicate.

1.4 million pills is nothing.

If that's nothing for you than that's only your opinion.

But sure, let's highlight that it was a Mexican national.

All the department of justice press releases follow the same format in relation to nationalities, if you read in the website you will find them mentioning even the state of which the person is from if he is American.

But unless we are talking about very few non-profit news organizations, you have to choose one of them.