quindraco 6mo ago • 81%
If they even did it. This is over a screenshot of a spreadsheet, not the spreadsheet itself, making it even easier to fake if someone was out to get them in trouble. I could make a pic of a spreadsheet claiming to be by BrikoX and doublejay1999 with maybe a minute of work in MS Paint.
quindraco 6mo ago • 100%
I've never seen "dufus" spelled that way before, it's immediately enticing.- like you hybridized the word with "Rufus".
quindraco 7mo ago • 1%
Sexual aggression is illegal in the UK? That sounds pretty boring, ngl.
quindraco 7mo ago • 76%
I don't think you understand how insurance works.
quindraco 10mo ago • 0%
The article you linked has at least 3 different kinds of socialism that satisfy "democratic" socialism:
Democratic socialists have promoted various different models of socialism and economics, ranging from market socialism, where socially owned enterprises operate in competitive markets and are self-managed by their workforce, to non-market participatory socialism based on decentralised economic planning.[127] Democratic socialism can also be committed to a decentralised form of economic planning where productive units are integrated into a single organisation and organised based on self-management.[22]
What definition do you mean by it?
quindraco 10mo ago • 0%
Capitalism with a strong safety net sounds like you're avoiding the question. The question is how to replace capitalism, not how to improve it.
How are you defining democratic socialism? Usually when I ask people to define socialism they answer with capitalism with extra undefined steps whereby the set of employees of a business is legally forced to be equal to that business's set of owners. I'm not familiar with "democratic" as a modifier to the term, though.
quindraco 10mo ago • 23%
Step 1: Think of a viable alternative.
No-one has yet achieved step 1, which makes subsequent steps harder. It's easy to get your hands on people who will answer with magical thinking, but a system that will actually work and isn't capitalism has yet to be invented.
quindraco 10mo ago • 100%
Do you have to support all of a nation's laws in order to support said nation? E.g. can you patriotically protest a law you think is unconstitutional?
quindraco 10mo ago • 80%
The judge clearly states that she does not care about innocent until proven guilty.
False. There is no judge.
quindraco 10mo ago • 20%
Cities are trash now, this will only make them worse because corporations are stupid. The new process will look like this:
- Buy plot of land.
- Build business without adequate parking.
- People park on the street, which will remain mysteriously legal but exacerbate the same disasters street parking already causes.
- Even with that, parking is insufficient. Business goes belly-up, causing urban blight.
- New investor goes to Step 1.
quindraco 10mo ago • 90%
Chiropracty isn't "scientific".
quindraco 10mo ago • 60%
We could always embrace capitalism by getting rid of corporations, like as a concept. They're a fundamentally anti-capitalist idea.
quindraco 10mo ago • 62%
That's not true. You don't have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.
quindraco 10mo ago • 71%
Does it count as a tell when it's irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he's lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word "Sir" doesn't change anything.
quindraco 10mo ago • 88%
It's fine, provided it's not a plot hole - i.e. your fantasy setting needs to not have abolished blindness as a realistic malady, which some settings do. E.g. LOTR 100% has blind people, while the Harry Potter universe only has very poor blind people, since solving blindness is as trivial as a polyjuice potion, even if nothing else works (and something more effective is bound to work).
quindraco 11mo ago • 66%
The government can ban tobacco, but it's undeniably tyrannical to ban a drug because you don't like the consequences people are choosing for themselves.
quindraco 11mo ago • 91%
He couldn't remember if he did or not, is the joke.
quindraco 11mo ago • 75%
The claim that hating the Israeli government is anti-Semitic is deeply anti-Semitic. Trump leveled the same core idea at Col. Alexander Vindman, that as a jew, his true loyalty must be to Israel. It's an all too common anti-Semitic trope.
quindraco 11mo ago • 84%
Speaking as someone who knows the definition (or more accurately, that there isn't one), it is not a first amendment issue.
quindraco 11mo ago • 93%
They do, in fact, have a legal leg to stand in. As shareholders, they can sue their board of directors for mismanagement.
![](https://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/167225794620221228after.png)