I'm not entirely sure which scene it is. This person has linked the actress as well, but the GIF is not from that shoot, that's a different couch. According to TinEye, this GIF originally propagated (without text) as tumblr_nwpfzrgSNT1s5y4eao1_500.gif, which has died to the great tumblr purge and link rot. Thankfully google found this version of the GIF without text. Unfortunately, the rest of the scene is still missing.

(If any Porn Historian is looking for the original GIF and can't find it, shoot me a DM, I'll probably still have it locally downloaded).

No problem, thanks!

There's the comment (just in case the @ didn't trigger a notification, I'm not entirely sure whether that works), thanks!

@yay@lemmynsfw.com here is the comment as requested!

I see your point, but I don't think nudity immediately qualifies as porn. For me the line would be if she was inserting the milk bottle somewhere for example.

This is filthy/sexy, but the sexy part is that she's getting milk thrown on her face, not litteral jizz, you get my drift?

IDK, for me the appeal is not the lack of nudity, but the people being sexy/filthy in an interesting way rather than the typical performance of porn you'll see on PH for example. If what you want is a lack of nudity, you might be more interested in !gonemild or maybe want to create a community like /r/clothedwomen.

Now that's proactive moderation! In the future I'll put the models in the comments to spare you the work.

I don't think there is one. At least going from the fact that I don't see many federated nsfw instances here at all, but maybe I haven't looked hard enough.

Tbh the legal and practical ramifications of hosting porn (particularly the borderline-legal kind) means that this is probably not going to be easy to get going for anyone living in a western country. I wouldn't get my hopes up too much for your friend.

EDIT: There's not. That's a real shame because even drawn CNC is verboten now, and I've had an incest caption removed today (no reason provided, but I'm assuming that since IRL incest is non-consensual by definition then it might be (partially?) verboten as a fictional kink as well).
I know I will hold off on contributing here for now until the content policy stops getting expanded every week. I had assumed "reddit-like" rules would apply, but they're already significantly stricter and there's no point in submitting niche content that will get removed down the line.

I mean, I get it from the admins' perspective. But from a user/contributor's perspective I really really hope they can figure out a way that we can still aggregate content that was previously allowed on reddit, else I hardly see the point of migrating.

Question: If moderations tools improve and allow, say, communities from certain instances to [edit: NOT] show up on "All"/"Communities", will it be possible to re-federate instances that allow some communities that are against the content policy?

Most (but not all) of the banned content on here is straight up illegal so it's not such a huge deal ATM, but (for example, as this is the most obvious "not-illegal-but-still-banned" content I can think of) anyone into CNC can't subscribe to it here (fair) but also can't subscribe to an external CNC community either. This may become a bigger problem as the Content Policy expands (as an extreme example, I've seen people call for the ban of ALL non-original content, which would be great for ethics but would basically require disabling federation altogether).

EDIT: oof, even hentai cnc is banned. I've expanded further down the thread, but from a user's perspective this really sucks because a lot of stuff that is well in the clear on reddit (sissy*, incest*, *dom, etc.) is potentially banned if we're going to have a fictional consent police. While I understand the admins' concerns, from a user perspective the current policy is already much harsher than any website I've ever been on that allowed porn.

Also is it even practical/sustainable to police things like fictional consent? Reddit doesn't not do it because they like it, they don't do it because it's unenforceable. Their rules are made to be unambiguous and easily applied: don't post underage stuff (duh), no revenge porn, no deepfakes, no illegal stuff. By saying "no noncon", this opens up so many edge cases that I don't think that they can be ruled on fairly. Is incest noncon? Is hypno porn? What about femdom? Bondage? That one scene from Blade Runner 1982?

If this is the first time you see InCase's art, you're in for a treat. This was one of his earlier works, you can find the rest of his work here.

20 MiB is more than enough! In .webp format you can fit any short repeating gif in reasonable quality in under 2 MiB (very short gifs in under 0.5 MiB).

However even with a 2 MiB .webp, the request was timing out server-side before it could be accepted. Ideally the size limit would be low enough and the timout large enough that the former would (almost) always trigger before the latter. Maybe the transcoding service was just peacing out though.

Anyway thanks for the good work!