'You're not my king': [Senator] Lidia Thorpe escorted away after outburst [at Charles III in Parliament House]
  • Nath Nath 17m ago 100%

    The real answer to this question is "habit". The people who drew up the Australian Constitution in the 1890's thought of themselves as British citizens, even though they were literally making plans for a new nation that would be independent of England. In terms of taxes, I don't believe Commonwealth membership costs us much - though I'm not super informed on this point. I could be swayed on the matter.

    Even as citizens of the new nation of Australia, that generation of Australians still thought of themselves as British, too. It took a few more generations for us to really think of ourselves as purely and exclusively Australian.

    If the constitution were being drafted up today, we'd have a serious conversation about whether we'd be a Constitutional Monarchy or some sort of Republic. But, it's not and we're not.

    There are real advantages to being a member of the Commonwealth of nations. I'm not entirely dissatisfied with the status quo. If we ever do split from the Commonwealth, I'd want to look closely at what is proposed to replace it. I would not for example want our government to end up like what our friends in the USA have.

    2
  • Daily Discussion Thread: 🐘🐒🌹 Monday, October 21st, 2024
  • Nath Nath 5h ago 100%
    • Get Seagoon_ back online
    • Work
    • Call Christmas Holiday booking place
    10
  • What weird food or dishes do you eat regularly at home that you would never serve to someone else?
  • Nath Nath 12h ago 100%

    If you are on a diet, this meal has very few kilojoules/calories. Fewer than a single slice of bread.

    5
  • meta
    Meta 15h ago
    Jump
    Emails from Aussie Zone
  • Nath Nath 14h ago 100%

    It's still potentially a solved problem. One that has been most annoying.

    5
  • Where'd everybody go?
  • Nath Nath 18h ago 100%

    It feels like everything in All is about an election in the USA, and that's really not very engaging to the rest of us. So I mostly hang out in Local for the most part.

    10
  • Daily Discussion Thread: ☕️ 🥱 Friday, October 18th, 2024
  • Nath Nath 3d ago 100%

    Yeah, we will of course. His artwork is even pretty good - particularly for him.

    5
  • Daily Discussion Thread: ☕️ 🥱 Friday, October 18th, 2024
  • Nath Nath 3d ago 100%

    There are no new account requests waiting for approval.
    Well, there was one, but it was some spam about roof repairs in Canberra and I rejected that one. Now, there are none waiting.

    4
  • Daily Discussion Thread: ☕️ 🥱 Friday, October 18th, 2024
  • Nath Nath 3d ago 100%

    @Duenan has hit the issue right on the head. 😆

    3
  • Daily Discussion Thread: ☕️ 🥱 Friday, October 18th, 2024
  • Nath Nath 3d ago 100%

    Wait, what? There's no accounts waiting for approval?

    4
  • Daily Discussion Thread: ☕️ 🥱 Friday, October 18th, 2024
  • Nath Nath 3d ago 100%

    As a fundraiser, the school sent us to a website where you can view some art your kid has done and then order it as a pillow, tote bag, calendar or a bunch of other options. Only this website lets you look at every piece of art that every kid in the school has done and pick any art any kid at the school has done. You just say I want this kid's art on my $15 tote bag, thanks.

    My dilemma is my kid is not the greatest artist in the school.

    15
  • New data reveals thousands of Australians who own 10 rentals or more
  • Nath Nath 3d ago 85%

    This is always where it gets complicated. One house is pretty limiting. Lots of people have holiday homes - should that become illegal? People buy homes to support family (particularly elderly or disabled family) members in an environment that allows them some space and independence.

    Should a married couple be allowed to have two homes? Should I be allowed to buy homes in my kids' names to get around such a limitation?

    I don't have the answers to any of this. Housing is a super complicated and politically charged topic. There are a million millionaires out there with the bulk of their net worth tied up in the value of their homes. The scary truth is they don't really want to solve this problem, because if houses stop costing most of a million (or more) dollars to buy, they stop being millionaires.

    5
  • Say the line, Albo!
  • Nath Nath 4d ago 100%

    The ABC reported that the location was close to his fiance's family. She's on the mortgage, also.

    3
  • George Negus, veteran Australian journalist and TV presenter, dies aged 82
  • Nath Nath 4d ago 100%

    We were talking about this one in the office yesterday. George was all over the telly 20 years ago. He was in our homes and seemed in our lives.

    But anyone who wasn't watching tv before about 2005 had no idea who he was.

    2
  • www.abc.net.au

    And as the article says - this data is only from individual tax returns. It doesn't cover companies.

    59
    23
    Daily Discussion Thread: Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Nath Nath 5d ago 100%

    Well, don't look at us. We sure didn't give it to 'em! 😀

    3
  • Daily Discussion Thread: Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Nath Nath 5d ago 100%

    I can't tell whether you are talking about a chocolate burger, or putting bacon into a chocolate shake. Either choice is interesting.

    2
  • Daily Discussion Thread: Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Nath Nath 5d ago 100%

    Cyanenergy exists for real? I thought they were a scam.

    2
  • Daily Discussion Thread: Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Nath Nath 5d ago 100%

    For sure, that's the target market - but the trick only works if the property holds that value in the first place. I don't see 9.3M value here, no matter how you twist and stretch it.

    2
  • Daily Discussion Thread: Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Nath Nath 5d ago 100%

    Loads of them in Southbank. Drive around that area around 7-8pm. Prime time of day for people to be home and awake. Entire apartment buildings are 75% dark.

    I'm not certain whether this will be the same. I truly can't see how they can be valued at $9.5M. Who the hell is going to buy them? 4 Bedrooms suggests families. But any family with that much to spend isn't going to want their kids on a busy corner and no yard to run around in.

    While it's derelict, there's a 4-bedroom house/yard going for $2M a few hundred meters away. You could spend a Million totally renovating that place and really sprucing it up and still move in before this building is finished. And for a third of the price.

    5
  • How many properties do politicians own? A public register provides the answer
  • Nath Nath 5d ago 100%

    They're paid well. Let's be real: I'd buy a dream home also if I pulled a parliamentary salary.

    I also believe they should be paid well. Corruption is a big enough issue with elected officials. You reduce the risk of bribery and corruption by taking "money" off their list of personal problems.

    Besides, PMs are still not paid enough for what they put up with. Imagine having half the country hating you and angry with you simply because your employer is not their favourite employer. Being the CEO of any large company pays better and comes with far less personal hate. It'd be like being the CEO of Coles where people exclusively shop at Coles or Woolies and are actively hostile at the customers and employees of the other. Oh, and their CEOs are famous household names. It ultimately doesn't even matter how good of a job you do, half the population is going to hate you and dissect every little thing you say and do anyway - on or off the clock.

    No thanks. Let the dude have his beach house.

    I am however in complete agreement with you on the investment property thing. I don't know what the solution to the housing crisis is, but you're sure not going to solve it by piling onto the problem. Renting out your house that isn't meeting your own needs for some reason or another is fine. There are many examples where that is understandable. Building a portfolio of 3+ houses and renting them out so you can live off that as income is something I believe needs to become far less attractive.

    3
  • ABC News redesign helps reduce doom scrolling by being ugly and difficult to use
  • Nath Nath 5d ago 100%

    This article has been incorrectly labelled as Satire.

    Dear Aunty, If you're going to throw a bunch of wildly new and experimental features at your news site, please at least make them options. I despise short-form videos. I don't want a whole section of the site dedicated to short videos. I disable YouTube Shorts every 30 days in the hopes YouTube will take the hint and let us kill them from our feeds entirely.

    When I want to watch videos, I fire up iView.

    8
  • I stumbled across a sports article from a US publication and thought it interesting that it showed the USA leading the medals table. Instead of the [regular table](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-31/paris-olympics-2024-medal-tally-australia-score-day-five/104154504) that gives weight to Gold, silver and bronze, they just see [total medals](https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/olympics/medal-count). I sorta like it. Celebrating all medal winners equally is nice. It feels a little like fudging the numbers, though.

    59
    29
    www.abc.net.au

    Super sad case. She tried to kill him to ease his suffering. If he'd been on the record supporting her decision, I think the sentence would have been very different. And she lost him to natural causes anyway. 😞

    53
    4
    meta
    Meta Nath 3mo ago 100%
    Instance blocked

    So, I've just done something that I said I'd be reluctant to do in future without community consultation and blocked an instance. I don't think anyone will have any issues with it, but I figured I'd let everyone know since this executive decision affects all aussie.zone users. ::: spoiler Hate content ![](https://lemm.ee/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Faussie.zone%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fa70c693c-6d02-4b63-86a0-d13e46a6c08a.png) :::

    21
    12
    www.afl.com.au

    cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/11231353 > If you have a kid/grandkid who loves footy, this is the time of year to take them. A single adult can take three kids to a game for the price of one ticket. > > For me today, the adult ticket was $58. With two kids, that worked out at less than $20 a ticket. > > Take your own snacks. Prices at the footy are actually offensive.

    6
    0
    "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearFR
    Aussie Frugal Living Nath 4mo ago 100%
    Kids are free at the footy rounds 16-19
    www.afl.com.au

    If you have a kid/grandkid who loves footy, this is the time of year to take them. A single adult can take three kids to a game for the price of one ticket. For me today, the adult ticket was $58. With two kids, that worked out at less than $20 a ticket. Take your own snacks. Prices at the footy are actually offensive.

    13
    0
    www.abc.net.au

    Just when you thought you'd made it through the holidays. 😀 I think a half-day strike is just as bad for parents than a full one. We still need to arrange for the kids to be taken care of until 12:30. Apparently we *can* send them in anyway, but they won't be in class and it isn't exactly supporting the teachers to do that. I hope there is progress in the negotiations and the strike gets called off.

    26
    2
    www.abc.net.au

    I just sort of assume everyone has watched the episode by now. If you haven't, I recommend doing so before you get to the end of this article.

    7
    2
    www.abc.net.au

    On the one hand, it makes it really hard to stay motivated with the teeny contribution I make to reducing emissions. On the other, think of how much of a difference these 57 companies could make if they actually reached net-zero targets.

    103
    9
    www.abc.net.au

    I'm sure this whole article comes as a shock to nobody, but it's nice to see it recognised like this.

    190
    34
    www.abc.net.au

    Ok, so here's my newest phobia. Happily driving along a bridge I've crossed over a thousand times before, only tonight I'm suddenly in the dark waters below!

    50
    7
    mastodonapp.uk

    Reddit > Mastodon > Lemmy because why not? 😁

    8
    1
    www.abc.net.au

    Try and get past the fact that this is sort-of about Facebook. Because it's more about the demise of news than it is about Facebook, specifically. > news organisations were never in the news business, Amanda Lotz, a professor of media studies at QUT, said. > > "They were in the attention-attraction business. > > "In another era, if you were an advertiser, a newspaper was a great place to be. > > "But now there are just much better places to be." > The moment news moved online, and was "unbundled" from classifieds, sports results, movie listings, weather reports, celebrity gossip, and all the other reasons people bought newspapers or watched evening TV bulletins, the news business model was dead. > > News by itself was never profitable, Professor Bruns said. > > "Then advertising moved somewhere else. > > "This was always going to happen via Facebook or other platforms." It's a really fascinating read. We can all agree that independent journalism is valuable in our society, but ultimately, most of us don't so much seek news out as much as we encounter news as we go about our day. I'm sure the TL;DR bot is about to entirely miss the nuance of the article. I recommend reading the whole thing.

    109
    29
    www.abc.net.au

    That's right Cronulla, your likely next local member isn't actually local. But, he promises he *will* be real soon! Good luck with that! Having lived in super safe-seats and marginal seats, I promise it's far better to live in a seat that flips every election!

    26
    7
    www.abc.net.au

    I don't think this movement really got off the ground in WA, we never really had the lock-downs and remote working culture introduced through the pandemic that the Eastern states got. Still, this makes for fascinating reading.

    56
    6
    www.abc.net.au

    I get that WA is financially far better off than 2017 projections. What I don't really understand is why it is so unfair for WA to get back 70-75 cents per dollar its populace puts into GST.

    30
    2